Round 2: Stone Vs. Bronstein
Sharon Stone has fired back against a San Francisco Judge who gave an unfavorable depiction of her in court documents relating to her custody battle over son Roan. Her Attorney Martin Singer gave this statement:
“This week it was reported in connection with Sharon Stone’s custody dispute that she wanted to have her young 8 year-old son undergo Botox treatment at this time for his feet. Sharon Stone never made this statement. It is a complete fabrication.”
Botox treatment for his feet? Can Botox cure foot odor? Or was Sharon drawing conclusions from her own experience with Botox? So many more questions than answers.
Like I’ve said before, I’m not a lawyer but I think that publicly calling the Judge presiding over your custody case a liar is not the smartest move, even if you’re only trying to convince public opinion.
Clearly, Sharon Stone is nuts. No doubt there. I personally have been left waiting for hours to interview this gal and have heard so many stories on how Diva-ish she is on set, it’s amazing. Even though I do believe all the stories, I still never thought badly about Sharon. Seriously, this is Hollywood, she is Sharon Stone and I’m as fickle as anyone else in this town but she is dumb.
I remember nearly peeing in my pants when the Judge in my custody case nearly fined me after I sat down too quickly after he came into the courtroom. A far cry from calling him a liar. Maybe I’m just too old school.
Good luck Sharon.
Popularity: 1% [?]
One Reply to “Round 2: Stone Vs. Bronstein”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.





















October 2nd, 2008 at 4:54 pm
But can the San Francisco Judge lie????
I dont understand.
Is it possibly to do so in US. A judge???!!
Its like having no law system at all!
Like a lottery!
Sound terrible.
Why do not all people protest?