Instead of thinking about some people helping each other without them knowing about it let’s explore another angle.

I hate to talk good versus bad, but as we have agreed I think that Sam and crew are bad — can we just explore in this simplified concept?

Let’s say there are two teams who want an end of c-ship. One wants it confident they can gain the cookie jar — that side still has Sam or Sam-esque people.

Then there is another good side — people like you, me, small and others. It’s not access to the cookie jar we are after but justice and the proper treatment of a human being with civil rights.

I am not going to say that K-Fed is on the bad side just that he is on another side of this puzzle — e.g., the right/hope to hold his head high.

Consider a room with multiple chess board games where you sometimes catch wind of what’s happening at another table but you are all in the same cigar laden room.

I can take an article published in the Daily Mail, disect it, but then wonder if it was “coincidence” that the article was even run and at this time.

Media is my thing. You know that. I got few others to talk to about it so it goes here for now.

Who knows?!

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0801/28/sbt.01.html

there you have the same link, earlier today..

I’m a gonna beat Nosey to this one today:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1092519/The-day-I-saw-Britney-Spears-8217-father-pull-knife.html

It’s obviously slanted otherwise why not to include that Jamie was doing okay in the restaurant business — as far as I know and didn’t Jamie try to give K-Fed a career there?

I have make a comment on this tread
“Britney Lights Another Tree Tonight”

And that have to do with Britney as ?????
I think Britney and Adnan, if they choice to, can handle this without our (or TMZ ) private eye.
There are limits on how close one should go into someone else private life. If we support B and A, its OK, but I dont think to support them is the same as talking bad about Britneys parents.

If I look on For the Record, its for having the opportunity to see and hear Britney.

Why do we have to know everything?

People are like leeches, thats why this papers can go out with lies, lies, and more lies.
They (the papers) made up storys, and people obvious take them serious.

“Sources, a sourse near XX”..and so on. Or worse, they say the person itself have done the intervju!
Dont people know by now that its almost 100% BS ?

Was she kept out of For the Record? What would be the design in that I wonder.

This particular article though is curious. It seems rather more designed than usual.

Other things are curious like Lynne not being anywhere in For the Record and OK Magazine carrying the TMZ story about Britney fighting with her dad to see Adnan.

How make it possible to make comments here without people taking it personal? When its not personal, but ordinarily comments about a subject.

I honnestly ask how to do.

Some one have to?
I dont know anyone who does. Do you?