Kate’s Hatin’ The Paps
Actress Kate Hudson is on the cover of the January issue os Elle and she sounds off about being followed by packs of photographers.
“They’ve become an entity to themselves… But eventually they’ll implode. They’re creating a house of cards that will inevitably fall. These are not nice people. When you’re taking your child to school, and they’re trying to get on school property to get a picture, it literally makes you want to just smack them.”
Of course, if her new film “Bride Wars” tanks next week, it won’t long before nobody bothers to take her picture.
Popularity: 1% [?]
Share:
4 Replies to “Kate’s Hatin’ The Paps”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
January 3rd, 2009 at 4:54 am
This is a moment when I really wish I could talk english better, because what I want to comment on this, I do not want to come out wrong.
There have been a long and big misunderstanding of the importens of paparazzi sites peoples right to dicide the impact of celeb persons being and future.
As it is for now, the gossip site and the paparazzi, sitepoint out different celeb people in a catorgory of GOOD or BAD. (Thats the way they try to rules the market, demand and acess
)
They choice out pics from the best or worst angles of celebs, depending if the celeb is in the category: “Holy for the moment”, or this is free to do what so ever with..
They choice to publish as bad angles as possibly, if the celeb not have that “don’t touch for the moment” label on.
And we who se the pics knows it, and we also know one thing more;
IF a celeb dare to say any comment about a paparazzi they will be punished hard.
The papparazzi have there site and all internet and pics, the celeb have only their own statement to hold on.
Its like the old “whore and madonna” complex, inside the mans brain, rules the celeb press.
Because of the videos (who almost everyone have going on now) we can all hear the ugly comments from the paparazzi when they insult celebs.
Or play overnice and smouth in their mouth.
Or when they talk to a celeb who in the category “Holy”!
They almost sound like they praying: “Thank you, Thank you, you are, (yes now it ARE, not “look” ) wonderful, thank you, thank you, thank you, always love you”
Let Kate Hudson have a future I beg
even if she said something “bad” about some of the paparazzis 
January 3rd, 2009 at 4:54 am
Moderation as usuaual..
January 3rd, 2009 at 6:29 pm
Ama, try not using the smile faces and your posts should go right through.
January 3rd, 2009 at 9:28 pm
Nosey, where are you?
Ama and others. If stars/celebs began to distinguish between good paps and bad paps, I wonder if a happy medium might be found.
It’s teamwork anyway. Maybe I am an idealist. ok I am an idealist. It’s natural for me to think (ideate) of how things may work v. how they do now.
Also, I think Ama you are missing a financial component of who really controls the photographs. You, I, and others are just one demographic: online clickers and viewers.
Who drives the market?
Supply and demand economics. Sometimes I feel you generalize overmuch.
There are paps who have compassion for their subjects and I don’t mean not snapping them, but convincing the celeb to “go home!” or to “Please for the love of God don’t get back on the road.”
I feel like you never see these people, acknowledge them or see a manner in which the business might be done.
X17 is the worst. To how many outlets I wonder were they able to sell a particular photo?
I don’t understand some of your broad sweeping statements. It’s like you have amnesia that Adnan was a leader of the pack on his beat. (beat = journalism term in this instance)