Who was that “unidentified very wealthy man”? Was it S Lutfi “in work”?

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Brit was supposedly dating her AA sponsor, John Sundahl, at the time. But it DOES sound like they were referring to Lutfi in the X article.

http://www.thehollywoodgossip.com/2007/06/john-sundahl-to-britney-spears-sober-up-or-die/

So far.

The public *already* hates Sam, so perhaps there’s a connection there (to the TMZ story and the Spears camp). Who knows.

The whole thing is just so darn bizarre.

I’d call this a “blessing in disguise.”

I hope she realizes just what she’s done…!! And I hope she remembers all of this when the conservatorship is lifted. There are some big amends that need to be made. My two cents.

Speaking of Britney’s management, we can also report that Britney’s going to be changing agents – she’s making the jump from William Morris to CAA! Could this be tied to her rumored desire to renew her film career?

Finally, and most titillatingly, we’re hearing that Britney may be off the market!

According to our source, Britney’s become “very good friends” with an unidentified very wealthy man, and that she and Alli have been spending a lot of time hanging out with him!

Apparently, he’s been her make the aforementioned business decisions – in addition to prompting her to make the switch from William Morris to CAA, he’s also helped her settle on a new divorce lawyer!)

Aside from that, Britney’s life’s been more or less on an even keel – we hear that she’s been spending a lot of time with her children and keeping her relationship with sis Jamie-Lynn positive even as their family endures these trying times.

Source: x17online”
***********************

Who was that “unidentified very wealthy man”? Was it S Lutfi “in work”?

While I have to agree with the majority of what Ma and Pa’s lawyers are saying in those documents…I have to wonder what would happen if they applied that same logic back towards the original Declarations that were filed in Feb ‘08.

It all seems to be awfully one-sided. It’s okay if The Machine uses “scurrilous” language, but if anyone does it to them, the claws come out and the lawyers file their papers.

It’s a bit of a metaphor for the world we live in these days. Corporations rule the world, while the little guy doesn’t get a chance to have a say. (Unfortunately, the little guy in this case is the Weasel himself. But still).

As for the TRO’s, I haven’t had a chance to read those docs yet. Hopefully soon.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
AM, I had a thought when I write my comment about RM…—”Maybe I have to point out that he OWNS the media, but he dont look on every single article or soap opera´s drive going on”…but then I thougt, nobody can be so stupid so they think I mean his the one who personaly is going after Adnan.

I had wrong.. There was one.

R M want his media to give profit. He dont care if they take down people as soon none of his papers/media not being sued.
He surtenly don’t care personal interested in Adnan.
But he would be very unpleased if his media not are “the ones” “the first” , “the moust selling”—-and as I said, it dont have to be ANY truth in 99,99% of his media. AS LONG IT GIVES MONEY BACK.

Have I explain it clear enough?

(Personally he have done some less well-turned-out opinions about some religions and kind of people, but who knows, he have maybe been wiser now?)

Too lazy to make any calls.

ohmygosh.

What I did post cost a little cha-ching and getting acquainted with public records.

Remember meanwhile, my Florida source said she had overpaid… don’t know what, don’t know when and right now they are fighting counterclaim against counterclaim.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

So have these four people testified? What was the result? Have the financials been submitted?

And did Goetz get the $$ reports?

Heh, I wondered what was provoking stories like these to drop today:

EXCLUSIVE: BRITNEY CRUSHING ON BACKUP DANCER

and

BRITNEY PLANS TO BECOME SOUTHERN BAPTIST MINISTER

Gotta give the masses something to talk about, right?

http://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/2009/03/judge-extends-tro-spears-case

———

In other news, 4 subpoenas were issued Jan. 8, 2009 from the L.A. Superior Court in the case of Britney Spears v. Johnny Wright.

They include Howard Grossman c/o GLWG Inc.; Mabel Tash and Robert Feldstein c/o Nigro, Karlin, Segal and Feldstein, LLP; Mabel Tash c/o “; Kenneth Hertz c/o Goldring, Hertz and Lichtenstein, LLP, all of the Los Angeles area.

I am betting Eardley said that in whatever he submitted Friday about Britney being in a forced work camp without privileges common to those in the work force.

Seems to be how the U.S. tabloids are shaping the bible story. They are rationalizing that being forced to read the bible is better having Britney go batty again.

Maybe I am reading into it or connecting too many dots but…