Posts Tagged ‘octuplets’
More On Octo-Mom’s Stripper Past
Wednesday, April 22nd, 2009
Octo-Mommy Nadya Suleman insists that she never worked as an exotic dancer, but details of her past havea way of coming out.
In Touch Weekly reveals that the mom of 14 stripped under the name “Angelina,” for at least a year in her early 20s. Hmm, interesting choice of a name. A stripper, who goes by the name Sage, dished “I met her at an amateur contest, and we wound up doing parties together,” and added “She was overly flirty with the guys we performed for.”
Driver Luis Ceballos has similar memories, saying the the media-friendly Nadya “always said she wanted to be really famous.” That certainly sounds like her, doesn’t it. Wonder how soon we’ll get to see the pictures?
Popularity: 1% [?]
Even Reality TV Shuns Octo-Mom
Thursday, April 16th, 2009
Nadya Suleman’s been claiming to have cut a deal for a “documentary” series about her octuplets—but it ain’t happening!
Octo-Mommy gave this statement to Life&Style: “Yes, it is official. I’m going to be doing a show, but it’s not a reality show. What I’m doing with this TV show is basically creating documentaries about the lives of my children. It’s going to be an ongoing thing, and it will follow them from now until they are 18. It’s being done by Eyeworks; they’re in the UK. It will air in the UK and then we’ll see if the US is interested.”
Sounds classy, right? Wrong! Thrfeed.com revealed that there’s no deal—nobody in the UK wants to carry the show! Worse, neither do the networks in the U.S., even the ones who have the sleaziest reality shows imaginable. Execs at TLC—home of “Jon & Kate Plus 8,” “18 and Counting” and “Paralyzed and Pregnant”—met with Octo-Mom but found her “much crazier than they expected.”
Gee, when you get turned down by TLC, where is there to go? While there’s no depth to which reality shows will not dip, this one is just too hard to sell—to both viewers and advertisers.
Popularity: 1% [?]
Octo-Mom – The Trademark
Wednesday, April 15th, 2009
Mommy-for-profit Nadya Suleman has all eight of her babies home now, so she can start looking at how to best use them to finance her hard-shopping lifestyle.
The Smoking Gun reports Suleman has filed two applications with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office seeking to trademark her tabloid title “Octomom” and intends to use the moniker on her own line of products including dresses, pants, shirts, and diapers. She also plans to register to title for use relating to a possible TV show.
I guess she isn’t aiming to use the trademark for a book on parenting, since she avoids the kids most of the time. Isn’t that what nannies are for?
Popularity: 1% [?]
Octuplet #8 To Come Home
Monday, April 13th, 2009
Soon she’ll have a full set! Octo-Mom can finally bring the last of her litter home today and start scheduling photo sessions.
RadarOnline reports Nadya Suleman will be bringing baby #8, Jonah, home from Kaiser Permanente Bellflower Medical Center to join his seven littermates, and their six ignored older sibs. Jonah was the smallest of the set, weighing only 1-pound, 8 ounces at birth on January 26. He also has a cleft palate.
Now the baby-pimping can really get underway, as mommy sells the first photos of the octuplets to the highest bidder, and signs on for that reality show. I hope her welfare check came on time, so she has a lot of diapers and formula ready.
Popularity: 1% [?]
Octo-Mom Wants More Tax Money
Thursday, April 9th, 2009
All you working folks, be sure to pay your taxes next week—Nadya Suleman needs more of your dough.
RadarOnline reports that the Octo-Mom is still getting Medi-Cal for her kids and is considering applying for more government assistance to feed her eight new additions. Apparently, she’s finally figured out how much money it takes to care for 14 kids. Too bad she didn’t think of that before.
The state is also paying for her round-the-clock nannies after Suleman dismissed the Angels in Waiting because she didn’t like their “energy” and calls them, “Evil, evil, devil’s incarnate.” Gloria Allred, attorney for AIW, gave this statement to RadarOnline:
“Nadya appeared to think that it was more important to bond with the sales people at JCPenney and Target than to be at home bonding with her newly discharged premature infants during the time that AIW was there…
Also, she appears to avoid explaining why she has made a deliberate decision to force the taxpayers to pay for the nurses from Kaiser Permanente who are now caring for the babies rather than accept AIW nurses who refused to and did not take taxpayer funds for caring for her infants. Her remarks would be laughable if the consequences were not so serious for the taxpayers and for her babies.”
Yes, citizens of California, when you have to raid your kids’ piggy banks to pay your taxes and tell them your home has been foreclosed, be happy you’re keeping Nadya in designer sunglasses.
Popularity: 1% [?]
